What immediately came to mind when thinking about the revision process was our most recent peer review session for paper 3. During our final peer review session I received the most helpful feedback during the semester. As a class, continually conducting peer review not only strengthened the feedback I personally gave to other peers, but it also gave a tremendous amount of critiques on my own writing, which I have never really received before. By getting this feedback I not only revised my writing, but whilst writing I was more aware of grammatical and structural errors I was making. The emphasis on global revisions on out first set of peer reviews allowed me to close the caps in my thesis and body paragraphs, so that the whole paper stayed on track. While getting this information about the errors in my paper, it allowed me to apply that knowledge to the papers of other classmates. Furthermore, whilst getting feedback on local revisions (grammar, sentence structure, etc.) I was able to reword and reformat the discontinuities in my work. This also allowed me to more consciously find errors in other peoples work as well. Peer review was the most useful tool that not only allowed me to progress my paper from first to final draft, but also give more useful feedback to peers.
